Stijn Paardekooper vs Deney Wassermann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Paardekooper vs D. Wassermann

Stijn Paardekooper
NED
w
w
w
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
24
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
854
0
Best Rank
607
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Deney Wassermann
NED
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
24
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
854
0
Best Rank
607
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Paardekooper 1 - 0 Wassermann
They have played 1 sets in total, with Stijn Paardekooper winning 1 and Deney Wassermann winning 0. The last match between Stijn Paardekooper and Deney Wassermann was at the M15 Haren, 03-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(5) ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paardekooper | 1 |
| Wassermann | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Haren(09-03-25)
Stijn Paardekooper
7
Deney Wassermann
6
S. Paardekooper vs D. Wassermann H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.76% (42-26) | Career Total W/L | 57.48% (123-91) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Paardekooper vs D. Wassermann Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stijn Paardekooper has won 44.79% of points on their second serve, while Deney Wassermann has won 44.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stijn Paardekooper, in recent form, has won 44.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Deney Wassermann has won 45.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.43% and 20.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stijn Paardekooper has saved 59.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Deney Wassermann has saved 64.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stijn Paardekooper has won 64.71% of matches played (W/L 22/12), with Deney Wassermann winning 46.15% (W/L 6/7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stijn Paardekooper has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 39/21), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/4). Deney Wassermann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 85/59), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 7/6).
- Player level: In the last year, Stijn Paardekooper has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 22/12), where as Deney Wassermann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 6/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stijn Paardekooper winning 0 times and Deney Wassermann being victorious 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Stijn Paardekooper winning 1 and Deney Wassermann winning 0.
- The last match between Stijn Paardekooper and Deney Wassermann was at the M15 Haren, 03-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(5) ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:1:54.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stijn Paardekooper has played against opponents with an average rank of 320.15 while Deney Wassermann has played against players with an average rank of 471.54.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stijn Paardekooper has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Deney Wassermann has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stijn Paardekooper has converted 30.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Deney Wassermann has converted 29.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Stijn Paardekooper vs Deney Wassermann Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Paardekooper vs D. Wassermann H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 7 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:1:54 | Average Match Time | 1:1:54 |
| 68% (27/40) | 1st Serve % | 63% (30/48) |
| 74% (20/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (20/30) |
| 54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 25% (1/4) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 42% (20/48) | Return Points Win % | 33% (13/40) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Paardekooper 49%, Wassermann 49%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Paardekooper 48%, Wassermann 49%.
Break Points Saved %: Paardekooper 68%, Wassermann 59%.
S. Paardekooper Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-1 7-6(6) | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(3) 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(6) 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
F | L | 6-4 0-6 6-4 | ||
D. Wassermann Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(5) ret. | ||
QF | L | 3-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 3-2 ret. | ||

S. Paardekooper vs D. Wassermann Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.76% (42/26) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.48% (123/91) |
| 60.00% (93/62) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.99% (283/205) |
| 53.41% (799/697) | Games Win/Loss | 53.04% (2537/2246) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.55% (30/25) |
| 65.00% (39/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.03% (85/59) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 129 | Aces Total | 509 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 96 | Total Double Faults | 648 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:21:18 |
| 300.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 459.5 |
| 63% (1640/2601) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6932/11698) |
| 65% (1073/1640) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (4711/6932) |
| 49% (469/961) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2393/4766) |
| 43% (112/261) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (514/1213) |
| 41% (1038/2546) | Return Points Win % | 41% (4725/11628) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (5/5) |
| 61.76% (42/26) | Futures W/L | 57.84% (118/86) |
| 61% (41/67) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (121/198) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 64% (7/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (32/63) |
| 50% (10/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (38/75) |
| 88% (42/37) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (129/108) |
| 12% (42/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (129/21) |
| 19% (26/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (84/16) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:30 PM 15/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction05:10 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico